The Motley Fool

I Made a 730% Annualized Profit on Amazon Stock. It Was My Worst Investing Mistake Ever.

Compound interest is a relatively straightforward concept. Nevertheless, it’s easy for investors (especially those just starting out) to underestimate the power of compounding. That was certainly the case for me when I first began investing.

This is the story of one of my earliest investments — in Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN). On an annualized basis, I made a phenomenal 730% return. But on the whole, my early dabbling with Amazon represents the biggest blunder of my investing career. Here’s why.

How not to invest

I first started investing in 2004. At the time, I was a sophomore in college, and between a small inheritance and summer earnings, I cobbled together about $15,000 to invest.

To put it mildly, I had no clue what I was doing. I wasn’t a finance major, nor had I done any outside reading about investing strategy. I didn’t know how to read an earnings statement, analyze a balance sheet, or evaluate a company’s cash flow. I didn’t even fully understand where to look for information about potential investments.

As best I can recall, my strategy — if it can even be called that — was to buy stocks trading near 52-week lows and sell them when they moved back toward the middle of their 52-week trading ranges. In short, the idea was to buy stocks that might be slightly undervalued and get out with a small profit as quickly as possible.

A bad strategy in action

In October 2004, a little more than two months after I opened my first brokerage account, I decided to buy Amazon shares. As a college student, I had used Amazon.com a few times that year to order textbooks and other items. Like most people at the time, I thought of Amazon as an online version of Barnes & Noble, and didn’t give much thought to its potential to expand well beyond selling books and other media.

I bought 150 shares of Amazon stock on Oct. 28, 2004: a Thursday. I paid $34.35 per share, bringing the total cost of my purchase to $5,163.49 including commissions. (This was long before the days of commission-free trading.) My entry price was near the stock’s 52-week low. Earlier in the year, Amazon stock had traded as high as the upper $50s.

AMZN Chart

Data source: YCharts.

The stock quickly rebounded from its late-October lows. In fact, by late December, it was back to around $45. However, I didn’t stick around that long. I sold my shares on Nov. 1 and Nov. 2: less than a week after I had bought them, fetching an average price of $35.45. After commissions, I netted $5,294.88 from the sale.

This gave me a profit of $131.39 after paying about $33 of commissions and trading fees. On the one hand, this represented a modest 2.54% return on my initial investment. On the other hand, since my average holding period was not even five calendar days, I could have theoretically compounded this return about 84 times in a year. On an annualized basis, that put the return on my Amazon stock at a staggering 730%.

If I had instead held those 150 shares until today, my annualized return would have been “only” 33%. However, with a holding period of nearly 16 years — instead of four to five days — my $5163.49 investment would now be worth around $450,000.

AMZN Chart

Data source: YCharts.

Invest for the long term

Two years after my initial blunder, I had a chance to correct my mistake. In September of 2006, I bought 100 shares of Amazon for $30.42 each: an even lower price than I had paid in 2004. Unfortunately, my patience had improved just slightly over the previous two years. This time, I held the stock for almost two weeks, walking away with a $201.91 profit. Once again, my annualized return was phenomenal (602%), but my actual gain of 6.6% after commissions was nothing to write home about.

The lesson from my experience as a novice investor should be pretty clear. Theoretically, an investor could earn triple-digit annual returns by banking single-digit gains on a different stock every week, but as a practical matter, your chances of sustaining a winning streak like that are near zero.

By contrast, if you buy a portfolio of companies with massive growth potential, holding for many years — or even decades — the gains from a few big winners (like Amazon) could power market-beating returns. Indeed, while I have been fortunate to identify a handful of multibaggers over the past decade, the gains I made from all of them combined pale in comparison to what I missed out on from selling Amazon stock (twice!) for a small profit. Patience is perhaps the most important virtue in investing — and that’s a lesson I had to learn the hard way.

This article was originally published on Fool.com. All figures quoted in US dollars unless otherwise stated.

#1 stock to catch a trillion-market opportunity

Discover the 1 stock that is set to DOMINATE this HK$1.2 trillion market opportunity and why investors think it could be the next Amazon of its industry. Just click here to download our FREE report now.

Thinking about investing in Hong Kong stocks? Discover 4 simple ways to turn it into your own “money tree”. We outline practically everything you need to know about the Hong Kong market in our latest report. Click here to see how you can grab your FREE copy of “A Foolish Guide for Hong Kong Investors” today.

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Levine-Weinberg has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Amazon and recommends the following options: short January 2022 $1940 calls on Amazon and long January 2022 $1920 calls on Amazon. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.